Why do we love medicines so much?

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Why do we love medicines so much?

Humans love medicinal drugs; we cannot get enough. Worldwide, the amount of money spent on medicines annually is growing exponen­ tially and is expected to reach around uS$1 trillion in 2012. So far, there has been no satisfactory explanation for human ‘pharmo philia’, our powerful trop­ ism to medicines. Most studies that have attempted to provide an explanation have focused on classical suppl...

متن کامل

Why Do We Continue to Burn so Much Coal?

Several sugar mills in southern Africa have adverse fuel balances for various reasons, and end up burning enormous amounts of coal. Some of the reasons for this are discussed, and two in particular are analysed in detail: time efficiency and imbibition. The variables that are directly related to the energy efficiency of a sugar mill are listed and their relative effects are discussed. The effec...

متن کامل

Why Do Chinese Households Save So Much?

Using a dataset that covers 5 decades (1960–2009), we show that the main determinants of China's household savings rate are disposable income (measured by its reciprocal) and the old-age dependency rate. The income growth rate and young age dependency rate have a limited role. Our findings support the Keynesian saving hypothesis instead of Modigliani’s life cycle hypothesis, although precaution...

متن کامل

Why Do the Rich Save So Much?

This paper considers several alternative explanations for the fact that households with higher levels of lifetime income (‘the rich’) have higher lifetime saving rates (Dynan, Skinner, and Zeldes (1996); Lillard and Karoly (1997)). The paper argues that the saving behavior of the richest households cannot be explained by models in which the only purpose of wealth accumulation is to finance futu...

متن کامل

Why do we love to hate ourselves?

Dhaliwal’s comment on Zwaan et al nicely refutes what has been called ‘the hypothesis of special cause’—the notion that when things turn out wrong, the cognitive processes leading to that outcome must have been fundamentally different (ie, error-prone) from when they turn out right. Dhaliwal’s argument recapitulates thinking that is over 100 years old; one of the early contributors to psycholog...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: EMBO reports

سال: 2010

ISSN: 1469-221X,1469-3178

DOI: 10.1038/embor.2010.108